Sunday, April 22, 2012

I Don't Understand Poetry


I don’t understand poetry. I don’t understand what its draw is, or why people write it, or what its structure is, or what its meanings are. I don’t understand why it’s so impacting and emotional, and because of that, I guess I do know what its draw is.

Once, in San Francisco, I saw James Earl Jones recite Walt Whitman’s “O Captain! My Captain!” His deep, distinctive voice and acting history alone are enough to make the poem an experience, but he was also backed by the entire San Francisco Philharmonic. The philharmonic paired perfectly with Jones’ intonations and timing, and at the end of the relatively short poem, I almost cried. Jones receive a standing ovation.

Growing up, poetry was, to me, something from the past. Shakespearean-era people read poetry. I didn’t wear tights and a neck ruffle, so it wasn’t for me. We touched on the medium briefly in high school, but it wasn’t until that reading in San Francisco that I understood its power.

I don’t have a natural talent for reading, writing, or understanding poetry, but every now and then I’ll come across a piece that really moves me. I was excited to receive a packet of poems in class a few days ago.

Professor Fordham mentioned hearing Tracy Smith reading her poem on NPR, so I visited the NPR website and listened to the news clip listing the Pulitzer Prize winners. The last segment was Tracy’s reading, and it was good to hear the author read her work. I read it out loud to myself first, so that I could see (or hear) two variations of the reading. Surprisingly, Tracy’s reading was very anticlimactic for me. Her reading was straightforward. Perhaps she wrote it to be read like that. Perhaps she read it simply in order to highlight the power of the words themselves. Whatever the case, it was far from the experience I had with Jones and the philharmonic.

To be honest, I didn’t see how Tracy Smith’s poetry is Pulitzer-worthy. At least, I couldn’t see it with “New Road Station.” I’ll admit, though, that I’ve only read one of her poems, and that the art is new and still foreign to me.

My favorite poem turned out to be Pablo Neruda’s “Bird.” Even though it was translated, I felt like the rhythm of the piece was more like one you’d find in a spoken word poem. It was easy to read, and there was a simple, catchy beat to it. By far, it is best read out loud.

Perhaps getting into poetry is like treading through food that people say is “an acquired taste”--it just takes time an effort. While I’m still not really into poetry, I’m willing for, and even desire, more exposure.


-Alexander Hirata

6 comments:

  1. I agree with you that poetry is an acquired taste! There are a select handful of poems that I really like, and it's hard for me to understand them--especially if they're really abstract or whimsical. That's really neat that you saw James Earl Jones and heard him recite Whitman's poem! It sounds like a powerful reading and I think I WOULD have cried. I also listened to Tracy Smith read her poem, and I found it frustratingly dull. I feel like poetry has more power if it's read in a powerful voice. I suppose it's different for everyone, though.

    --Laura Strawn Ojeda

    ReplyDelete
  2. That James Earl Jones recital sounds really cool, haha. I didn't know they did things like that, it makes me want to go to one now.

    And I completely agree, poetry is pretty hard to read. Whenever poetry is part of a reading assignment, I always have to read them two or three times (at least) before it sinks in. I never used to get it before, either, but now that I'm exposed to constantly as an English major, it's been growing on me.

    -Justyne Marin

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree. Poetry is definitely hard to understand. Its something that I have not yet mastered as far as picking it up, reading it and understanding it right away. However, I've found that some of my favorite pieces are found in poetry such as Shakespeare's Love Sonnets or Suheir Hammad's political poems.

    I guess its not just picking it up and skimming through it but its actually picking it up, taking your time to read it and understand it. Poetry that is skimmed through is not as enjoyable as poetry that is studied out.

    -Felicia Tonga

    ReplyDelete
  4. I disagree, Alex - but only for the sake of being different. Poetry always surprises me. I will read the whole poem three or four times and be 100% sure I know exactly what the author is talking about, then I'll show up to class and learn that the agreed message of the poem is something completely different from my analysis. Even if I don't understand the author's intent, at least I came to understand something new about myself and the world through my own perception.

    Perhaps looking at poetry in the sense of what it means to you and not to the author, or even the scholars, you can enjoy it a lot more.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The above comment was made by Ruthie Heavrin

    ReplyDelete
  6. It took quite a while for me to get into poetry, but still it is not my major field. It is rather entertainment for me. Learning to like something may take time, but once you are in it, it is hard to stop. One thing I know is that poets are really the artists of language.

    Hae-Lim Lee

    ReplyDelete